Legal Opinion

Sun Light Prepaid Phonecard Co. v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 2004No. 25840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice MOORE:

We are asked to determine whether the trial court erred by finding certain long distance telephone cards and electronic phone card dispensers to be illegal gambling devices. We affirm.

*51PROCEDURAL FACTS

Appellants commenced this action following respondents’ (the State’s) seizure of appellants’ pre-paid, long distance telephone cards (phone cards) and electronic phone card dispensers. Appellants sought the return of the phone cards and dispensers and damages resulting from the seizure. Before hearing the claim for damages, a trial was first held on the declaratory judgment claim to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Whaley v. Dorchester County Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Jimmy Martin v. Reginald LloydCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
  3. Ward v. West Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. 1 Dragon's Ascent Video Gaming Machine v. SLEDCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  5. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API