Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Gerald K. Umphenour

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 2016No. 43286-2015Published

1DissentBurdick, Justice

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I am unable to conclude that what happened before the district court on May 22, 2013 was a guilty plea. Rather, the record reflects that a bench trial was conducted, albeit an irregular one. The transcript from that day shows that the following colloquy occurred between the court and the parties:

THE COURT: Counsel indicated before we came in that you had discussed this case further, and that there was a proposal that the parties stipulate to certain facts, and that the Court make findings based upon those facts. Is that generally what…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API