In Re RH
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
791 A.2d 331 (2002)
In the Interest of R.H.
Appeal of R.H.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued December 5, 2000.
Decided February 21, 2002.
Jason Zac Christman, for appellant.
Bernard Ashley Anderson, Stroudsburg, for appellee.
Stuart Lee Knade, Harrisburg, for appellee amicus curiae.
Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN, and SAYLOR, JJ.
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
NIGRO, Justice.
In this appeal, Appellant R.H., a minor, argues that the Superior Court improperly affirmed the order of the trial court denying his motion to suppress the statements he made…
Also in this document: Dissent · Cappy; Dissent · Castille; Concurrence · Newman; Concurrence · Saylor.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Com. v. Hughes, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019