Legal Opinion · Dissent

Herring v. Dunning

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1994No. A94A0450Published

1DissentPope, Chief Judge

I dissent. In my opinion the facts here establish only that the parties’ attorneys were engaged in on-going settlement negotiations, with a series of offers and counteroffers going back and forth between them. Part of these negotiations concerned the manner and to what extent defendant would be released from liability to plaintiff. An agreement as to the terms of that release was not reached within the time specified by plaintiff’s attorney for acceptance of the offer. Inasmuch as there was no meeting of the minds concerning the essential terms of the settlement agreement within the specified…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grossman v. Smith, Barney Real Estate FundCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API