Manice v. Millen
New York Supreme Court
APPEAL by the defendant from a judgment entered at a special term, denying a motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover the possession of demised premises, and the plaintiff recovered a verdict,
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Mitchell, P. J.
In 1852 the plaintiff, Manice, leased to one Stone two lots of land in the city of Hew York, for ten years ffom 1st of May, 1852, at a certain rent, payable quarterly ■ with the proviso that if the rent should be in arrear, or if default should be made in any of the covenants therein contained on the part of the lessee or his assigns to be performed, the lessor might re-enter. The lessee covenanted that he and his assigns would pay the rent, and would also pay and discharge all such taxes, (including the Croton water tax,) as during the said term thereby demised…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Kenny v. Seu Si LunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Granite Building Association v. GreeneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903
- In re the Schoelkopf, New York County Courts1907
- United States v. Lazaro RomanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- No. 82-7043Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983