Legal Opinion
Montgomery Ward, LLC v. Wiseknit Factory, Ltd. (In Re Montgomery Ward, LLC)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided April 17, 2003No. 17-12800PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RAYMONF T. LYONS, Bankruptcy Judge. 1
Plaintiff^debtor, Montgomery Ward, LLC (“Montgomery Ward”), brought a motion for summary judgment on its complaint alleging that Defendant, Wiseknit Factory Ltd., (‘Wiseknit”), violated the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(a)(1), (3), and (6) by instituting a breach of contract action in California to collect on a pre-petition obligation. 2 Montgomery Ward further alleges that Wiseknit’s violation of the automatic stay was willful and seeks damages under 11 U.S.C. § 362(h), as well as other relief. The relief sought by Montgomery Ward in its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Atlantic Business and Community CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Allied Chemical International Corp. v. Companhia De Navegacao Lloyd BrasileiroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Constitution Bank v. TubbsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Moog World Trade Corporation v. Bancomer, S.A. Boatmen's National Bank of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Mu'minUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Caffey v. Russell (In Re Caffey)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008
- In Re HawkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In Re R.H.R. Mechanical Contractors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Holland v. Arch Coal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.