Legal Opinion
Kassatly v. Yazbeck
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 1990No. Civ.A. 88-3218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
REVERCOMB, District Judge.
This action arises out of the lease and possible sale of The Grand Hotel by Joseph Kaempfer and his various real estate partnerships 1 to Joseph Yazbeck and his businesses (“the Yazbeck defendants”). 2 Plaintiff Richard Kassatly, a former confident of Joseph Yazbeck, brings this diversity action alleging that he is entitled to a finder’s fee for the transaction.
Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss Kaempfer’s real estate partnerships as defendants is GRANTED in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in C.T. Carden v. Arkoma, - U.S. -, 110…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Carlsberg Resources Corporation v. Cambria Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Alford v. RaschiatoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- George Nangen & Co. v. Kenosha Auto Transport Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- RDP Development Corp. v. SchwartzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Kassatly v. YazbeckDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Grano v. Sodexo, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Television Events & Marketing, Inc. v. AMCON Distributing Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2007