Legal Opinion
Curry v. Sutherland
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 16, 2005No. S05A0258PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINES, Justice.
Caveator Mary Nan Curry appeals from the grant of summary judgment to the propounder of the will of her father, Paul Curry. Finding that the grant of summary judgment was proper, we affirm.
Paul Curry executed a will on July 17, 2002; he was then 86 years old. He named his caregiver, Jean Sutherland, as Executrix and named his friend, James Clanton, as alternate Executor. Sutherland, Clanton, and another friend of Paul Curry’s, Steve Grissett, were named as equal beneficiaries of his entire estate; he specifically excluded his daughter and only child, Mary Nan Curry (“Curry”),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Quarterman v. QuartermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Winchester v. Sun Valley-Atlanta AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Ashford v. Van HorneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bailey v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Ingersoll v. IngersollDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Johnson v. BurrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
- Smith v. LineySupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Pope v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.