Legal Opinion

Andrade v. Hammond City of

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 6, 2020No. 2:15-cv-00134Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION JOSE ANDRADE, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO.: 2:15-CV-134-TLS CITY OF HAMMOND, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 35], filed on February 23, 2017. In pertinent part, the Defendants argue that (1) the Rooker- Feldman doctrine has divested this Court of jurisdiction and (2) the Plaintiff’s allegations are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The Court agrees with the latter argument. As such, for the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API