Honeycutt v. Colgan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAR from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Plaintiff is the auditor of Madera county, and defendant is controller of the state. The action is to compel defendant to settle with plaintiff, by allowing the latter the several amounts claimed, aggregating $8,547.26. These several amounts making this aggregate are set out in seventeen separate counts, in an amended complaint, representing sums accruing at the semi-annual settlements from May, 1895, to the December settlement in 1903. It is alleged that these amounts were “part of the punitive penalties collected upon the redemption of real estate in Madera county during the six months…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. BanburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Collier v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- San Diego Investment Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Long Beach City School District v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Weston Investment Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Main v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989