Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rex v. Cia. Pervana De Vapores, S. A.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 17, 1981No. Nos. 80-2335, 80-2336Published

1DissentSloviter, Circuit Judge

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that when the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is fairly read, it must be construed as providing the sole basis of federal jurisdiction in actions against foreign states and their instrumentalities, as defined in the statute. Therefore, I agree that we cannot avoid the constitutional issue presented by the elimination of the right to jury trial in *70actions against corporations which are conducting the commercial enterprises of foreign states.

I dissent from the holding of the majority that a suit for damages against a corporation owned by a foreign state…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API