Lloyd v. Reynolds
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Greenleaf on evidence, 275; Hamilton v. Thrall, 7 Neb. 210; Brondberg v.Babbott, 14 Id. 517; O’Leary v. Lskey, 12 Id. 136; Baier v. Humpall, 16 Id. 127; Rothe v. Rothe, 31 Wis. 572; Curtis & Co. v. Cutler, 7 Neb. 317; Caldioell v. Dickson, 26 Mo. 61; Thomas v. Thomas, 15 B. Mon.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Greenleaf on evidence, 275; Hamilton v. Thrall, 7 Neb. 210; Brondberg v.Babbott, 14 Id. 517; O’Leary v. Lskey, 12 Id. 136; Baier v. Humpall, 16 Id. 127; Rothe v. Rothe, 31 Wis. 572; Curtis & Co. v. Cutler, 7 Neb. 317; Caldioell v. Dickson, 26 Mo. 61; Thomas v. Thomas, 15 B. Mon. (Ky.) 185; Shepard, v. White, 11 Tex. 356; Woodman v. Chesley, 39 Me. 50. cited: Wyche v. Green, 11 Ga. 159; Kerr on Fraud and Mistake, 417; Coquillard v. Hovey, 23 Neb. 622. .
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
This is an action of forcible entry and detainer brought by the plaintiff against the defendant in the county court of Cass county, where judgment was rendered. An appeal was taken to the district court, where on the trial a verdict. *65was returned in favor of the defendant, and a motion for a new trial having been overruled, judgment was entered on the verdict.
The attorneys for the defendant now move to dismiss the case, because no' summons in error was issued and served within a year from the rendition of the judgment in the court below. The record shows that judgment was entered in that…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Ayres v. AmsberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Radil v. SawyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Ayres v. AmsberryNebraska Supreme Court · 1920