Legal Opinion
Gripe v. City of Enid
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 4, 2002No. 01-6430PublishedCited by 136 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Roger D. Gripe appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as a sanction for his lawyer’s repeated violations of court orders and rules. The district court denied plaintiffs motion for relief from judgment. Because the statute of limitations on his claims has expired, he cannot refile them. Plaintiffs principal argument is that he should not be penalized for his lawyer’s shortcomings. We affirm. 1
Appellate Jurisdiction
As a preliminary matter, we discuss our jurisdiction. The district court dismissed the action on November 1, 2001. Plaintiff filed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Jernigan v. StuchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Mobley v. MccormickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by136 opinions
- Nasious v. Two Unknown B.I.C.E. AgentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Davis v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- ECCLESIASTES 9: 10-11-12, INC. v. LMC Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Summit Park Townhome Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- HCG Platinum, LLC v. Preferred Product Placement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.