Legal Opinion

Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. Owen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellee against the appellant, to recover the value of a cow injured *406so that she was of no value, by the locomotive and cars on the road of the defendant, at a place where, as is alleged, it could have been, but was not fenced. There was judgment in the common pleas for the plaintiff. There are three valid assignments of error.

1. Overruling the defendant’s motion to set aside the service of the process.

2. Rejecting the second paragraph of the defendant’s answer.

3. Overruling the defendant’s motion fora new trial.

This action was commenced in the common pleas.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Toledo, Wabash, & Western Railway Co. v. HowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. ParkhurstIndiana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. ClosserIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Memphis & Cincinnati Packet Co. v. PikeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API