Legal Opinion

Reigle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1992No. 178 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYER, Judge.

Robert D. Reigle appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) affirming a referee’s denial of benefits for mental injuries allegedly caused by stress from his job with Federal Express (Fed Ex). We affirm.

Reigle came to work part-time for Fed Ex during the height of the Christmas season. After three days of training, Fed Ex sent him out alone to make deliveries. Reigle failed to complete all the “priority one” 1 deliveries before the deadline. He became worried. Michael Shannon, his supervisor, told him not to worry because this was expected of trainees,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. DeMarco v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Archer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Russella v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Greco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. DOC SCI-Chester v. C. Faison (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. Philadelphia Elec. v. Wcab (Miller)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API