Legal Opinion

Design Built Sys. v. Sorokine

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided February 26, 2019No. A151264; A152059PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, Acting P. J.

*680These consolidated appeals assert three claims of error by the trial court. The first was directing a verdict against appellants as cross-defendants on a claim they violated an Internal Revenue Code provision and thereafter awarding $20,000 in sanctions and $122,995 in attorney fees against them. The second was directing verdicts against appellants on claims they had asserted against others, which ruling was premised on appellants' inability to prove damage because the trial court had granted a motion in limine preventing appellants from introducing evidence of payments made to an unlicensed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nazaryan v. FemtometrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  2. Nazaryan v. FemtonmetrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API