Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Reyes v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1997Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Goldstein, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part and votes to reverse the judgment appealed from, and to reinstate the complaint in its entirety, with the following memorandum, in which Friedmann, J., concurs: In a civil action, the plaintiff has the right, but not the obligation, to make an opening statement (see, CPLR 4016; De Vito v Katsch, 157 AD2d 413, 415). Similarly, there is no provision in the CPLR for dismissal of a complaint based upon the plaintiff’s opening statement. However, pursuant to CPLR 4401, the court can dismiss based upon the plaintiff’s "admissions” which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heard v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. De Vito v. KatschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Wenger v. GoodellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Rovinsky v. Hispanidad Holidays, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API