Legal Opinion

People v. Watkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 12, 1996PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of various crimes involving damages to or thefts from five mausoleums at the Mt. Hope Cemetery in Rochester, New York, defendant contends that reversal is required because Supreme Court permitted the People, as part of their direct case, to introduce evidence of prior uncharged crimes, without conducting a Ventimiglia hearing (see, People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350).

We conclude that the court’s failure to conduct a Ventimiglia hearing was error, but that the error is harmless in light of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. HollowayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. BoylanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. HogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. HOGUE, GERALD E., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. HogueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API