Legal Opinion

In re Will of Barfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 25, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The caveator challenges the authority of the trial court to set aside the verdict on the ground that in a caveat proceeding there are no parties, a nonsuit cannot be taken or directed, the issue must be passed on by the jury, and hence no discretionary power is lodged in the court to set the verdict aside. This Court has held the trial judge does have authority to set aside the verdict in his discretion when the verdict is against the greater weight of the evidence. On the authority of In re Westfeldt, 188 N.C. 702, 125 S.E. 531, and In re Hargrove, 207 N.C. 280, 176 S.E. 752, the order of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re WestfeldtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. In Re Will of HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. In re HargroveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Will of HodginCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API