Legal Opinion
Kurash v. Layton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 4, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 412 (1991)
598 A.2d 535
FRED J. KURASH, SR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
RUSSELL LAYTON, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Special Civil Part, Essex County.
Decided June 4, 1991.
Fred Kurash, plaintiff, pro se.
Russell Layton, defendant, pro se.
FAST, J.S.C.
Plaintiff is the owner of a purebred beagle. Defendant, who is a neighbor of plaintiff, owns a dog that has impregnated plaintiff's dog on two occasions. The result of the first union was six mongrel puppies: two stillborn and four that were given away. Plaintiff informed defendant of the breeding and resultant birth; he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Schroeder v. PerkelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- 525 Main Street Corp. v. Eagle Roofing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Kulas v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burgess v. Shampooch Pet Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2006
- Hyland v. BorrasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Irwin v. DegtiarovMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014