Legal Opinion

Kornman v. Raskin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 30, 1939No. 8 Div. 962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

The complainant, appellee here, filed the bill in this cause seeking a dissolution of a mercantile partnership, existing between himself and the respondent Joe Kornman, and for an accounting. The bill also made one Archie Danoff a co-respondent thereto, but upon the hearing, no relief was granted against this respondent, and he does not join in the appeal prosecuted by the other respondent.

On final hearing, the court granted the complainant relief, as against the respondent Joe Kornman, holding that a partnership did exist between the complainant and the said Kornman, and that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Glover v. HembreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Elledge v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Dugger v. TutwilerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  4. Reilly v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Heller v. BerlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roberts v. WeinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Endsley v. DarringSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Doss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Hunter v. ParkmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. State Ex Rel. Little v. LaurendineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API