Aungst v. ROBERTS CONSTRUCTION CO.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Hicks, J. —
Here we consider whether a non-Indian company may, by a sophisticated business arrangement, avail itself of Indian tribal immunity from state court jurisdiction to shield itself from charges of statutory violations. We hold it may not.
Respondent Roberts Construction Co. (Roberts) owned or controlled land valued in excess of $1 million located within or adjacent to the Tulalip Indian Reservation. In May of 1977, Roberts transferred this real estate to the Tulalip Tribes of Washington (Tribe). Following the transfer, an agreement was struck between Roberts and the governing body of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Salois v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Starlie Lomayaktewa v. Stanley K. Hathaway, and Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Johnston v. Beneficial Management Corp. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Tommy P. v. Board of County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Gildon v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
- Gildon v. Simon Property Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.