Legal Opinion

State v. Nance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 21, 1994No. 61571PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his convictions for three counts of first degree assault in violation of § 565.050, RSMo Supp.1993. We affirm.

Defendant’s sole challenge on appeal is to the sufficiency of the evidence to convict him as an aider and abettor of three counts of first degree assault. Our review is limited as follows:

On review, the Court accepts as true all of the evidence favorable to the state, including all favorable inferences drawn from the evidence and disregards all evidence and inferences to the contrary. [Citation omitted.] In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. DulanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. State v. ForisterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. Gonzalez-GongoraMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. JeffriesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FriendMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In re S.B.A.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. DixsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API