Legal Opinion

Wallace v. Merrimack River Navigation & Express Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1883PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevens, J.

The plaintiff was sailing Ms yacht on the Lord’s day, and thus travelling in violation of the Gen. Sts. c. 84, § 2, which permits this only for reasons of necessity or charity, none of which are assigned by him. He contends that he may recover upon the first count of his declaration, alleging that the defendant carelessly and negligently ran its steamboat into his yacht while thus sailing. Where the illegal act of a plaintiff contributes to the injury he recéives from the carelessness of another, he cannot recover; but if his illegal act is independent of the injury, he is not thereby…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wright v. J. & S. WilcoxNew York Supreme Court · 1838
  2. Levi v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Ramsden v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. McGrath v. MerwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  5. Damon v. Inhabitants of ScituateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aiken v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. McCarthy v. TimminsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Bowler v. O'ConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Potter v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API