Legal Opinion
Protest 942682-G of De Pompei
United States Customs Court
Decided March 14, 1939No. 40825PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dallinger, J.
On the record it was held that the wine press in question is manifestly a mechanical contrivance for utilizing and applying energy or force and is not an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim at 27½ percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953