Legal Opinion

Protest 942682-G of De Pompei

United States Customs Court

Decided March 14, 1939No. 40825PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

On the record it was held that the wine press in question is manifestly a mechanical contrivance for utilizing and applying energy or force and is not an article having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. The claim at 27½ percent under paragraph 372 was therefore sustained.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953