Legal Opinion

Childrey v. City of Atlanta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1940No. 28078PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

The defendant was convicted, under an ordinance of the City of Atlanta, of doing business without a license. His' certiorari was dismissed, and he excepted. Counsel for the city contends that the ordinance requiring a license was not set forth in the petition for certiorari; and that the petition should have been dismissed or denied; citing Porter v. Thomasville, 16 Ga. App. 313 (85 S. E. 283). We recognize the rule there stated, that superior courts and the reviewing courts will not take judicial notice of municipal ordinances; and that a petition for the writ of certiorari must set out the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Hartfield v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Allen v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Grubbs v. City of QuitmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewenstein v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  2. Foster v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Collier v. MerckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API