Legal Opinion
Madaia v. Petro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 19, 2002PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages *483for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Oliver, J.), dated May 22, 2001, as, upon reargument, adhered to so much of its original determination as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Dawn Donovan, also known as Dawn Egbert, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against her.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The infant plaintiff, Gregory Michael Madaia, was bitten by a dog…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lebron v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Bemiss v. AckenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Velez v. AndrejkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Wilson v. LivingstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- McKnight v. ATA Housing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Smith v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Logie v. LesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.