Legal Opinion
Wallen v. Williams
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 13, 1812PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
11 U.S. 278 (1812)
7 Cranch 278
WALLEN
v.
WILLIAMS.
Supreme Court of United States.
March 13, 1812.
Present ... . All the Judges.
JONES, for the Plaintiff in error.
P.B. KEY, contra.
TODD, J.
The attachment to compel a performance of the decree was unavailing; and upon the return of it, the habere facias was issued in conformity with the practice in that state, as admitted by the counsel on both sides in the Court below. It was ordered as a matter of course, and no objection was made. If this motion should prevail, it will make the writ of error operate as a supersedeas, contrary to the intention of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wallen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams v. Law Ex Rel. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Ferguson v. DentUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
- New England R. v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
- Thompson v. Van VechtenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1855
- United States ex rel. Stokes v. KendallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1837
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.