Legal Opinion

Scott v. Scott

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 23, 2005No. AC 25744PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

In this postjudgment marital dissolution matter, the plaintiff, James L. Scott, appeals from the *885judgment of the trial court finding him in contempt of court and ordering him to pay, as a therapy expense, one half of the cost of private boarding school for the parties’ minor child. On appeal, the plaintiff argues that the court improperly found that the private boarding school attended by the minor child was therapy within the meaning of the judgment of dissolution. We agree and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following factual and procedural background is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hardisty v. HardistySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Prial v. PrialConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Bucy v. BucyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
  5. Ottiano v. Shetucket Plumbing Supply Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brody v. BrodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API