Legal Opinion

Simon v. PIE Nationwide, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 1996No. 91-12398; CA A79303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) denying him an award for permanent partial disability. We reverse and remand.

Claimant filed a claim for a work-related hernia, which SAIF accepted. After surgery, the attending physician, Dr. Molleras, found no permanent impairment, and SAIF issued a Determination Order awarding time loss only. However, an independent physician, Dr. Mayer, concluded that claimant had “some permanent impairment” and “is going to be very susceptible to injuries in the future and that he should not return to heavy lifting [.]” On…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Volk v. America West AirlinesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Gallino v. Courtesy Pontiac-Buick-GMCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Benzinger v. Oregon Department of Insurance & FinanceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Ferguson v. U.S. Epperson UnderwritingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Jackson v. Tuality Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gevers v. Roadrunner ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Lopez v. Agripac, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API