Legal Opinion

Potts v. Honorable Justices of Supreme Court of Hawaii

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 20, 1971No. Civ. 71-3403PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

Plaintiff Potts, a citizen of the United States, was neither a qualified and registered voter in the State of Hawaii nor had he “physically, resided in Hawaii continuously for a period of six months after attaining the age of 15 years” prior to September 13, 1971, when the Hawaii bar examination was scheduled to be given to those seeking to be licensed to practice law in the State of Hawaii. Nevertheless, over 60 days before that date he filed application to take the examination. There was no question that he met all prerequisites for eligibility to take the examination, 1 except the…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by23 opinions

  1. Clifton C. Tang v. Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court, First Department, and Honorable Justices Aron SteuerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  2. Raffaelli v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Brown v. Supreme Court of VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1973
  4. Huffman v. Montana Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1974
  5. Louis v. Supreme Court of NevadaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API