Legal Opinion
Nussenzweig v. diCorcia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*340Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered February 15, 2006, which, to the extent appealed from, as limited by the briefs, granted the motion and cross motion of defendants Philip-Lorca diCorcia and Pace/MacGill, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
We agree with Justice Tom’s opinion, for the reasons stated therein, insofar as he concludes that the statute of limitations bars the action. Therefore, we do not reach the issue of whether defendants’ use of plaintiff’s photograph is entitled to First Amendment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- MATTER OF PETERS v. New York City Hous. Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- People v. CarvajalNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People Ex Rel. Unger v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- CLARA C. v. William L.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Matter of Haydorn v. . CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foster v. SvensonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- TRB Acquisitions LLC v. YedidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Williams v. HansellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010