Legal Opinion

NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 6, 2020No. 5:18-cv-02352Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NETFUEL, INC., 8 Case No. 5:18-cv-02352-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING CISCO’S MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 CISCO SYSTEMS INC., Re: Dkt. No. 114 11 Defendant. 12 13 Defendant Cisco’s summary judgment motion is presently before the Court. Cisco filed 14 the motion before the close of fact discovery. The Court has considered the parties’ papers and 15 listened to their oral arguments. The Court denies the motion.1 16 I. Background 17 Plaintiff NetFuel has accused 27 families of Cisco routers and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fraser v. GoodaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  3. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Gateway, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  5. Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API