Geliebter v. First National Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Chabi.es A. Whxiams, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Fitch
delivered the opinion of the court.
3. Escrows, § 1*—what unnecessary to prove in action by holder. It is not necessary that an escrow holder, who is suing a bank upon certified checks deposited with such escrow holder as earnest money, in'lieu of the actual cash, in the course of the making of a contract for the sale of real estate, aver and prove a consideration, as a prima facie case is made out by offering the checks in evidence and proving the signatures. 4. Escrows, § 12*—who has burden of proving failure of eonsideration. The burden lies upon the defendant, in…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Orner v. LinerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925