Legal Opinion

Fox v. Arctic Placer Mining & Milling Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1919Published

Appeal by the plaintiff, David Fox, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of May, 1918, upon a dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court at the close of plaintiff’s case.

1Opinion of the Court

Merrell, J.:

The plaintiff, David Fox, commenced this action to recover of defendant, Arctic Placer Mining and Milling Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Washington, for alleged services which he claims he rendered and performed for the defendant between the 1st day of November, 1913, and the 1st day of April, 1915.

The defendant was a corporation organized for mining in Alaska. The plaintiff was' a mining engineer with some experience in the Alaskan fields. The plaintiff was a stockholder and director of the defendant corporation and its vice-president, and had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Gaul v. . Kiel Arthe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Gill v. New York Cab Co.New York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Palmer v. ScheftelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API