Legal Opinion
Pabst Brewing Co. v. Corrao
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 26, 1998No. 96-C-903PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1243DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is a motion by the plaintiff, Pabst Brewing Company, Inc. [“Pabst”], to enforce surety’s liability pursuant to Rule 65.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
A class action complaint for a declaratory judgment was filed on August 12, 1996, by Pabst. The complaint was amended on August 14, 1996. Pabst’s declaratory judgment action arises out of its July 31,1996, decision unilaterally to amend its welfare plan and its life plan. There were two amendments to such plans: (1) the termination, effective September 1, 1996, of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Edward F. Krull v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
3Cited by5 opinions
- Momenta Pharm., Inc. v. Amphastar Pharm., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Axia Netmedia Corp. v. Mass. Tech. Park Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Axia NetMedia Corporation v. Massachusetts Technology Park CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Broker Genius Inc. v. Seat Scouts LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018