Legal Opinion

Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 584

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.

There are three motions before the court. The motions are in substance the same and are made by several of the named defendants.

*692The plaintiff herein has sought a declaratory judgment, alleging in its first cause of action that the named defendants illegally conspired with other teamster locals and with plaintiff’s competitors to force plaintiff out of the business of selling milk at milk depots by including in a number of area-wide collective bargaining agreements, which were negotiated without plaintiff’s participation or consent, a clause 62A applicable only to the plaintiff. The second…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Local 24, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. Milk DriversNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 584New York Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Consumer-Farmer Milk Cooperative, Inc. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Local No. 584New York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fullerton v. International Sound Technicians of Motion PictureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API