Legal Opinion

Cavins v. Cavins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1988No. 15354PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Judge.

This proceeding was precipitated by a garnishment for 51 months delinquent child support. The garnishment was issued at the request of the wife. The husband filed a motion to quash the garnishment alleging that the wife had by acquiescence waived her right to delinquent child support. The trial court denied the motion.

The husband contends he should have prevailed because of the following facts. The delinquency commenced when the wife violated the existing decree by removing the children from the state without leaving a current address. This resulted in denial of visitation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Grommet v. GrommetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Hart v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. DeMoranville v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Vincent v. VincentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Boland v. State, Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Saeuberlich v. SaeuberlichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API