Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wells

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1793PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ejectment for a tract of 440 acres of land, called “Danger, ’ ’ situate on Raccoon creek.

The lessor of the plaintiff founded his legal title on a warrant dated 16th March 1786, a survey thereon by John Hoge, deputy surveyor, and a patent dated 7th September 1786.

The defendant’s counsel objected, that the survey was made by one who had no authority, that the lands lay within the district of Presley Nevil and Matthew Ritchey, esq. and that by the 15th section of the act of assembly, “to provide fur- ‘ ‘ ther regulations, whereby to secure fair and equal proceed- ‘ ‘ ings in the land office, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lessee of Hubley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1796
  2. Marcy v. GardinierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. M'Namara v. ShorbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  4. Fritz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. Prout v. BardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Goddard v. GloningerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  2. Marcy v. GardinierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. M'Namara v. ShorbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  4. Fritz v. BrandonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  5. Prout v. BardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API