Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Safeco Insurance

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 8, 1988No. 19084-9-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

50 Wn. App. 254 (1988)

748 P.2d 666

JACK C. ARMSTRONG, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. 19084-9-I.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

January 8, 1988.

Paul J. Burns, Mathew D. Griffin, and James J. Rosenberger, for appellants.

James P. Hunter and Anderson, Hunter, Dewell, Baker & Collins, P.S., for respondent.

RINGOLD, J.

This case presents an issue of first impression concerning an insurer's refusal to renew an auto policy. RCW 48.18.292(1) requires an insurer which does not renew to give 20 days' notice to the insured and to include the actual reason for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API