Legal Opinion

Musser v. Swift & Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1954No. 7982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Plaintiffs, hereinafter referred to as respondents, and defendant, hereinafter referred to as appellant, entered into a "Poultry Raising Agreement”. Under the terms of this agreement appellant was to deliver 4,000 poults to respondents and from time to time deliver to them necessary feed to be used for fitting and preparing the turkeys for market. Upon delivery of the poults and from time to time upon delivery of the feed by appellant to respondents, both of which were to be financed by appellant, a charge against respondents’ bailment account was to be and was set up.

Responden…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Mountain Home Co-operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Olson v. Idora Hill Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Adamson v. MattsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Goodell v. Pope-Shenon Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Walling v. McMillan Sheep Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Izumi v. Kwan Doo ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  2. State Ex Rel. Symms v. City of Mountain HomeIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API