Legal Opinion

Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. Mears

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. D-17-0004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[¶3] In her response, Ms. Mears stated that Dr. Cushner "was never a client," although "there was a brief period of time in which we were friends." She acknowledged that she had reviewed and commented on a contract he was negotiating, but asserted that this was only "a favor to a friend." Ms. Mears did not deny that she had received money from Dr. Cushner, but explained that

his large dog ... severely injured my much smaller dog necessitating more than $7,000 in veterinarian bills before she finally passed as a result of the injuries caused by his dog. Additionally, [Dr.] Cushner's dog also…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mendicino v. WhitchurchWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State Board of Law Examiners v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State BarWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. DavidsonWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Stacy E. Casper, Wsb No. 6-3431Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Gayla K. Austin, WSB 6-4397Wyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. HiattWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bd. of Prof'l Responsibility v. MearsWyoming Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API