Legal Opinion
Tri-Dam v. Frazier
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 30, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00408Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 TRI-DAM, Case No. 1:20-cv-00408-SKO 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 11 v. (Doc. 23) 12 SCOTT FRAZIER, 13 Defendant. 14 _____________________________________/ 15 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Tri-Dam (“Plaintiff”) filed this action against Defendant Scott Frazier 19 (“Defendant”), alleging causes of action for violation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. 20 § 825p, public nuisance, private nuisance, trespass, and interference with express easement. (Doc. 21 1 (“Compl.”).) On…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.