Legal Opinion

Gosline v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Saline Circuit Court. cited, Hite vs. Hunton, 20 Mo., 286 ; Dougherty vs. Downey, 1 Mo., 674. cited, Wagn. Stat., 1006, § 1.

1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge

This was a suit on a mechanic’s lien. The question was raised, by a motion to dismiss, whether the filing of the petition- was such a commencement of the action as section 16 of the act (2 Wagn. Stat., 911) required, or whether the action must be held to have been commenced from the dale of the writ issued on the petition. The fact in this case was that the petition was filed within the ninety days required, hut the writ issued the next day, which was outside of the ninety days. The court dismissed the action on the ground, that under the first section of the 4th article of the Practice act…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841
  2. Hite v. HuntonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Evans v. BroaddusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Spurlock v. SprouleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. South Missouri Lumber Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Merchants' Refrigerating Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
  5. McGrath v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API