Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re the Marriage of Hunt

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 18, 1995No. 93SC565, 93SC631Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Lohr

These cases present an issue concerning the division of military pension benefits in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. The formula adopted by the majority for the determination of the portion of such benefits to be classified as marital property and for division of that marital property between the spouses under the deferred distribution method employed by the trial court in each case is as follows:

Years of Service During Marriage x Monthly Benefit x ⅜

Years of Total (After Taxes) Service

Maj. op. at 532. By applying this formula, known as the “time rule” formula, a trial court effects both…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. Kraus v. KrausSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. In Re the Marriage of PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Liggett v. LiggettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API