Legal Opinion

Paskus, Gordon & Hyman v. Peck

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 14, 1964PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEugene M. McCarthy, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the summons and vacate the service thereof on the ground that the summons does not contain the indorsement required by section 902 (subd. [a], par. [1]) of the New York City Civil Court Act.

Section 401 of said Act provides that the summons shall be in such form as may be provided by rule. Rule II (subd. [a]) of the rules of this court (then in effect) sets forth as an example a form of summons requiring the defendant to ‘1 appear * # # before the clerk” of the court within 10 days after the service of the summons “and to make answer to the complaint ”; and “ if you…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Steffens v. MartinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Overhauser v. FowlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Creative Woodworking Co. v. BohnCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964
  3. Magic Alleys, Inc. v. BuckUtica City Court · 1967
  4. Mattiazzi v. Hotel Belvedere Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  5. Onorati v. National Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API