Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Satterlee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 15, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Edward Gilbert, from a judgment óf the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Rensselaer on the 9th day.of May, 1904, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial at the Rensselaer Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Houghton, J.:.The defendant Satterlee was- one of the magistrates of the town of Berlin in Rensselaer county, and the defendant Nichols presented to him an information alleging that the plaintiff had committed the crime of peddling teas and coffee and other merchandise in the public streets of the town of Berlin without having obtained á 'license therefor as required by an ordinance adopted by the town board, and asked that a warrant for plaintiff’s arrest be issued, which was thereupon done..

By section 184 of the Town Law* (added by Laws of. 1898, chap, ■ 538, and amd. by Law's of 1899-,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Lange v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Swart v. . RickardNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schall v. IrwinNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Smith v. Bell & Fyfe Foundry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Coleman v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Vitterio v. St. Regis Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API