Legal Opinion

East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. Eggmann

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Fourth District;—heard in that court on appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. B. H. Canby, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

This is an action on the case by appellee, as administrator of Joseph F. Rowland, deceased, against appellant, for negligently causing the death of his intestate, under the provisions of sections 1 and 2 of chapter 70 of the Revised Statutes. Upon a trial in the city court of East St. Louis the plaintiff recovered a judgment for §3500 and costs of suit. On appeal to the Appellate Court for the Fourth District that judgment was affirmed, and the defendant below now prosecutes this further appeal.

The declaration charges that while the deceased was in defendant’s employ as a carpenter,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. GilbertIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad v. EggmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Martin v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Pridmore v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. ThomsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API