Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1968No. 165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

Defendant is an indigent. The trial court entered an order permitting him to appeal in forma pauperis and directed that the County of Cleveland furnish defendant’s counsel a transcript of the trial. Defendant’s counsel was ordered by the court to perfect his appeal, and the case on appeal and defendant’s brief were mimeographed at public expense.

This is the second appeal in this case. At the July 1966 Session of Cleveland County Superior Court, defendant was convicted for the identical offenses for which he was convicted in the instant case. At that Session he received sentences substantially…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State Highway & Public Works Commission v. HartleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Paris v. Carolina Portable Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Huff v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. McGheeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API