Legal Opinion

Wiesenthal, Trustee v. Wickersham

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The above-entitled cause is now being determined on plaintiff’s appeal on questions of law from the judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Columbus, Ohio.

On the first day of August, 1939, a judgment was taken by the plaintiff against the defendant, H. L. Wickersham, in the amount of $480.48. Thereafter, the judgment not having been paid, an affidavit in aid of execution was filed to subject the earnings of the defendant, who was at the time an employee of the tfivil Service Commission of Ohio, to the payment of the judgment.

Garnishee process was duly issued to the treasurer of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Penhallow v. Doane's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
  3. People v. SnyderIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Gill v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals · 1936
  5. Uricich v. KolesarOhio Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Menaker v. Hofstra Univ.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. George Williams, Jr., United States of America v. Rosa L. Sumpter, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Lussia Rein, United States of America v. James A. Lincoln, United States of America v. Mary L. Lincoln, United States of America v. Michele E. Lincoln, United States of America v. Albert Lincoln, United States of America v. Norris Dubose, United States of America v. Thelma DuboseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API